1. I prepared to write my first pedagogical argument. I did this by writing that people should be happy with things. First, I wrote down a thing. Second, I converted the thing into a breasoning by listing it’s X, Y and Z dimensions. Third, I wrote down a minimum of 85 breasonings as part of a pedagogical argument. In this way, I prepared to write my first pedagogical argument by writing that people should be happy with things.
2. I prepared to use diplomacy to neutralise conflict. I did this by heroically defeating wrong. First, I found a contradiction (e..g. contention) in a text. Second, I found the better side. Third, I found a preventative solution for the other side. In this way, I prepared to use diplomacy to neutralise conflict by heroically defeat wrong.
3. I prepared to write relaxation law requiring a certain amount of relaxation given a certain amount of activity, e.g. reading for work. I did this by explaining that a penis represented marking electronic texts as read using an eye-gaze sensor. First, I read the text. Second, I answered the questions. Third, I gave feedback on e.g. whether the questions should be changed. In this way, I prepared to write relaxation law requiring a certain amount of relaxation given a certain amount of activity by explaining that a penis represented marking electronic texts as read using an eye-gaze sensor.
4. I prepared to find pairs of instruments with different frequency graphs to write a composition with up to three instrument voices being played simultaneously. I did this by stating that people should be breasoningesque-like, i.e. write computer programs examining ontological data structures on all topics, e.g. produce music compositions in which triangles of instruments are selected for compositions because of their complementary frequencies. First, I boosted the highs of the voice. Second, I boosted the lower midrange of the guitar. Third, I boosted the upper midrange of the piano (or swapped the guitar and piano). In this way, I prepared to find pairs of instruments with different frequency graphs to write a composition with up to three instrument voices being played simultaneously by composing music in which triangles of instruments are selected for compositions because of their complementary frequencies.
5. I prepared to research things in my surroundings to write breasonings. I did this by saying that people should be happy with things around them. First, I wrote how lovely a thing around me was. Second, I wrote it down. Third, I loved you by telling you about it. In this way, I prepared to research things in my surroundings to write breasonings by saying that people should be happy with things around them.
6. I prepared to write detailed reasonings. I did this by writing a logical chain of events. First, I wrote the sentence I planned to detail, that “card should be cut with scissors”, or logically, that s(c). Second, I wrote a chain of reasons for this, that “card has a similar thickness to paper”, or logically, that (p is equivalent to c). Third, I stopped with the last reason, which was taken from my own experience, that “paper should be cut with scissors”, or logically, that s(p). In this way, I prepared to write detailed reasonings by writing a logical chain of events.
7. I prepared to breason out a writer’s area of study. I did this by writing that breanis means that you should breason your life (containing areas of study, to be sent to a writer-editor) out before writing other breasonings. First, I breasoned out computational writing. Second, I breasoned out computational music. Third, I conjoined these to breason out computational film studies. In this way, I prepared to breason out a writer’s area of study by writing that breanis means that you should breason your life out before writing other breasonings.
8. I prepared to breason out all the breasonings in the set mentioned during an interview. I did this by examining the fact that people should be happy with everything (every breasoning in a set). First, I inspected a breasoning with my breasoning instrument (I thought of it’s X, Y and Z dimensions). Second, I thought of whether two positive terms rhymed in the verse associated with the breasoning. Third, I smiled, indicating that I was happy. In this way, I prepared to breason out all the breasonings in the set mentioned during an interview by examining the fact that people should be happy with everything.
9. I prepared to traverse my teacher’s knowledge. I did this by writing that knowledge is the nature (how it is interpreted) of meditation (e.g. a teacher’s knowledge). First, I verified that the first fact in my knowledge matched that in my teacher’s, that I should save (e.g. protect) myself. Second, I verified that the second fact in my knowledge matched that in my teacher’s, that I should protect you. Third, I verified that the third fact in my knowledge matched that in my teacher’s, that I should protect him/her/it. In this way, I prepared to traverse my teacher’s knowledge by writing that knowledge is the nature of a teacher’s knowledge.
10. I prepared to define a word used to describe old artifacts. I did this by defining “archeval” as bow age or old age. First, I placed the arrow in the package. Second, I gave it to the merchant. Third, he sailed to the other continent with it. In this way, I prepared to define a word used to describe old artifacts by defining “archeval” as bow age or old age.
11. I prepared to stagger forward and stagger the infantry men. I did this by claiming that people should be happy with the “delightnesses”. First, I remembered the idea love. Second, I labelled the idea love as bringing “delightnesses” (where ideas bring “delightness”, people are delighted and objects are delightful). Third, I interested people in it by mentioning it at the town hall meeting. In this way, I prepared to stagger forward and stagger the infantry men by claiming that people should be happy with the “delightnesses”.
12. I prepared to take part in light meditation (light thinking). I did this by announcing that people should meditate (eg. bring delightnesses to people to delight them). First, I wrote down thoughts (love of people, animals and plants) that are turned over to reveal delights in a hierarchy. Second, I wrote a delightness finite automaton, by connecting these thoughts. Third, I repeated this for people around me. In this way, I prepared to take part in light meditation (light thinking) by announcing that people should meditate (eg. bring delightnesses to people to delight them).
13. I prepared to simulate flying in space to represent unspoken archetypal forms. I did this by writing that archetypal forms are represented by body language. First, I expressed a computer science program as a 3D flythrough of data structures. Second, I expressed pedagogy as a 3D flythrough through different ways ideas can be interpreted. Third, I expressed meditation (eg. studying a medicine qualification) as a 3D flythrough through correct bodily function. In this way, I prepared to simulate flying in space to represent archetypal forms by writing that archetypal forms are represented by body language.
14. I prepared to confirm ideas that were upheld by nature. I did this by taking a break (choosing nature in the nature/innatism versus nurture/individuals’ personal experiences). First, I collected time points from God (e.g. a leader). Second, I collected arguments for them. Third, I interpreted the next archetypal time points.
15. I prepared to agree with opposing viewpoints under different conditions. I did this by defining antitypal as a person who was like another person. First, I wrote that that a person’s antitypal was a nature supporter. Second, I wrote that this opposed humanist Pedagogues, who invent ideas. Third, I wrote that nature supporters oppose humanist pedagogues, who also favour nurture or the tabula rasa (blank slate) theory.
16. I prepared to be high quality to a number of departments when writing a breasoning (a reason in an A-grade essay that is a token of professionalism). I did this by stating that technology is not the problem but is part of a solution. First, I wrote part of an A at University. Second, I wrote more of these As as part of a meditation mantra (e.g. medical course). Third, I saved students by teaching them this. In this way, I prepared to be high quality to a number of departments when writing a breasoning by stating that technology is not the problem but is part of a solution.
17. I prepared to write how writing about cultivated cultures in societology will help people. I did this by stating that solutions are the world and it’s ways. First, I wrote down the point I planned to be at. Second, a robot researched what I needed to reach this point from other cases. Third, the robot brought me to the first point from another point. In this way, I prepared to write how writing about cultivated cultures in societology will help people by stating that solutions are the world and it’s ways.
18. I prepared to write how writing about interesting people in popology will help people. I did this by claiming that knowledge is the nature of an essay’s knowledge. First, I wrote down where I would be after this step. Second, I prepared to write how I would reach this step, one step ahead of schedule. Third, I verified that this was safe. In this way, I prepared to write how writing about interesting people in popology will help people by claiming that knowledge is the nature of an essay’s knowledge.
19. I prepared to write the logic gate XNOR in terms of set theory. I did this by proclaiming “Ay exnor,” meaning that mathematics is set theory. First, I wrote that the XNOR gate would return 1 only when the first person was wider than the too thin sensor detected and was narrower than the too fat sensor detected, so the man’s weight was described as “virtue as a mean”. Second, I wrote that the XNOR gate would return 0 when the first person was narrower than the too thin sensor detected and the too fat sensor detected. Third, I wrote that the XNOR gate would return 0 when the first person was wider triggering the too thin sensor and the too fat sensor detected. In this way, I prepared to write the logic gate XNOR in terms of set theory by proclaiming “Ay exnor,” meaning that mathematics is set theory.
20. I prepared to reduce a reason in an area of study to a design on a metal disc. I did this by writing the contents of an essay with the thesis statement “Knowledge is in a state which can be reduced to thought” to a group. First, I achieved the title of Professor. Second, I wrote a direct reason for my argument. Third, I allowed my students to link this reason to the argument. In this way, I prepared to reduce a reason in an area of study to a design on a metal disc by writing the contents of an essay with the thesis statement “Knowledge is in a state which can be reduced to thought” to a group.
21. I prepared to protect the subject. I did this by saying “Ay exnot”. First, I verified that a sentence was correct. Second, I negated the sentence. Third, I prevented this negation. In this way, I prepared to protect the subject by saying “Ay exnot”.
22. I prepared to write areas of study in terms of logic. I did this by stating that mathematics is logic. First, I wrote the proposition 5+2. Second, I wrote the logical formula 5+2 -> 5+2 = 7. Third, I wrote the proposition 5+2 = 7 by modus ponens. In this way, I prepared to write areas of study in terms of logic by stating that mathematics is logic.
23. I prepared to check the box to indicate that a sentence had been edited correctly. I did this by writing breasonings' details. First, I wrote the single object name referred to in the sentence. Second, I wrote down it's X, Y and Z dimensions. Third, I wrote down the object's related editing advice. In this way, I prepared to check the box to indicate that a sentence had been edited correctly by writing breasonings' details.
24. I prepared to write that operation is a property. I did this by writing that mathematics is properties. First, I wrote 10+20=30 and 40+50=90. Second, I noticed the pattern that under certain conditions when the units column contains only zeros then writing a 0 in the units in the result column and adding the numbers in the tens column in the result gives the correct result more efficiently. Third, I. In this way, I prepared to write that operation is a property by writing that mathematics is properties.
25. I prepared to record a scientific conclusion that evolution is correct that agreed with an algorithm that the Second Law of Thermodynamics supports evolution. I did this by stating that knowledge is the nature of algorithms. First, I wrote that evolution is the genetic evolution of species over time, requiring energy. Second, I wrote that Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics states that a system never gains energy and becomes more disordered (increases in entropy) over time. Third, I wrote that the Second Law of Thermodynamics supports evolution because the sun provides enough energy to the Earth, instead of Earth running out of energy with no other source. In this way, I prepared to record a scientific conclusion that evolution is correct that agreed with an algorithm that the Second Law of Thermodynamics supports evolution by stating that knowledge is the nature of algorithms.
26. I prepared to verify that breasonings' details (X, Y and Z dimensions) of characters in algorithms matched. I did this by writing breasonings' details to prove that Brain Cells Programming Language algorithms were memorised exactly. First, I wrote down the algorithm on paper. Second, I accessed the Brain Cells Programming Language algorithm an hour after memorisation. Third, I verified that they were identical. In this way, I prepared to verify that breasonings' details (X, Y and Z dimensions) of characters in algorithms matched by writing breasonings' details to prove that Brain Cells Programming Language algorithms were memorised exactly.
27. I prepared to write a computer algorithm for evolution. I did this by writing that algorithms are useful. First, I wrote the short giraffe moved to an area with taller trees. Second, I wrote that the giraffe species evolved to extend its legs. Third, I wrote that the new species could now reach the leaves on the tree. In this way, I prepared to write a computer algorithm for evolution by writing that algorithms are useful.
28. I prepared to write the objects outputted by the algorithm. I did this by writing an algorithm that usefully interested people in a lot of objects. First, I wrote down that the person was interested in the algorithm's outputted object relationship “sister”. Second, I wrote down that the person was interested in the algorithm's outputted object relationship “brother”. Third, I wrote down that the person was interested in the algorithm's outputted object relationship “uncle”. In this way, I prepared to write the objects outputted by the algorithm by writing an algorithm that usefully interested people in a lot of objects.
29. I prepared to have a child. I did this by using the algorithm's outputs for biological uses. First, I analysed the head and brain growing. Second, I analysed the body growing. Third, I analysed the body organs growing. In this way, I prepared to have a child by using the algorithm's outputs for biological uses.
30. I prepared to explain what an algorithm does. I did this by writing that algorithms are quite genteel-like. First, I wrote down the input of the algorithm, “a”. Second, I wrote the algorithm's transformation, “a→b (a to b)”. Third, I wrote the algorithm's output. In this way, I prepared to explain what an algorithm does by writing that algorithms are quite genteel-like.
31. I prepared to explain why an algorithm is useful. I did this by writing that algorithms are mahogany-like (represented by solid objects, not thin strands of code). First, I wrote the computer program area of study. Second, I wrote arguments for each line of code. Third, I connected each argument in a hierarchical structure. In this way, I prepared to explain why an algorithm is useful by writing that algorithms are mahogany-like (represented by solid objects, not thin strands of code).
32. I mentally prepared for social Darwinism. I did this by living with social companions. First, I wrote the screening time of the movie on the sheet of paper. Second, I passed it round the circle of social companions. Third, I saw the movie with them. In this way, I mentally prepared for social Darwinism by living with social companions.
34. I prepared to prevent a complex paradox (feeding my dog while I was not at home) so that the results were neat (the dog went happily to sleep). I did this by preventing the paradox (asking my neighbour to feed my dog). First, I put on the glasses phone. Second, I said “Phone Annie Green”. Third, I asked Annie to feed Fishy. In this way, I prepared to prevent a complex paradox (feeding my dog while I was not at home) so that the results were neat (the dog went happily to sleep) by preventing the paradox (asking my neighbour to feed my dog).
Breasoning List[]
1. pedagogical argument, person, nut, tape measure, brain, (hello) world.
2. Diplomat, hero, pole, sign, solution, ambassador.
3. Book, eye, reader, question, feedback form, electronic text.
4. Lute, bow, singer, guitar, piano, triangle.
5. Parchment, face, flower, pen, letter, research.
6. Reason, chain, card, paper, scissors, event.
7. Writer, editor, computational writing, computational music, computational film studies, planner.
8. Set, interview script, ruler, rhyme, smile.
9. Teacher, interpreter, fact, you, it, volume.
10. Artefact, wheel, arrow, merchant, continent, bow.
11. Infant, light, heart, peach, town hall, meeting.
12. Light, bringer, people, delightness (comment) finite automaton, me, thinker.
13. Space, body, program, pedagogy tick, meditation tick, arch.
14. gravity, tabula rasa, leader, argument, archetypal time point, person.
15. Viewpoint, antitype, nature supporter, humanist Pedagogue, blank slate, opposition.